Loss components in practical transmission lines at HF

It is often held that dielectric loss is a large contribution to total loss in practical transmission lines at HF.

An insight can be obtained by using the loss model described at Transmission Line Loss Calculator, and plotting the loss model components (conductor and dielectric) for practical transmission lines.

The graph above shows the matched line loss components due to conductor and dielectric losses for RG213 and LMR400 coaxial transmission lines. The reason for the shape of the curves is that conductor loss increases proportionately to square root of frequency, whereas dielectric loss increases proportionately to frequency.

Note that for RG213, conductor loss is much larger than dielectric loss up to 30MHz, ie dielectric loss is less than 10% of the total loss. In fact, it is not until 5000MHz that dielectric loss equals conductor loss (though by that frequency, very high loss limits the practical use of such a line).

Why then does so called ‘foam RG213′ such as LMR400 have lower loss?

RG213 uses a solid polythene (PE) dielectric, and LMR400 uses foam PE dielectric, has approximately the same jacket and outside conductor diameter, and a larger centre conductor to deliver the same characteristic impedance as RG213. It is the larger centre conductor that is responsible for the lower conductor losses that is the main contribution to the relatively lower loss of LMR400 at HF.

Of course, if low grade dielectric such as PVC is used, the dielectric loss at HF is more significant. Something to keep in mind when using ZIP cord, PVC insulated power cables, PVC insulated telecommunications and data cables for RF transmission lines at HF and above.

VK1OD on the 'net. I appreciate feedback, click on the ... in webm...@vk1od.net for my email address.